trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

African Americans are victims of a disproportionate number of police killings

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Evidence indicates that African Americans experience a disproportionately higher risk of being killed by law enforcement in the United States compared to white individuals.

The analysis

Judged against statistical and reference sources.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Wikipedia: Police brutality in the United States. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_brutality_in_the_United_States

Reference article covering this claim directly

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

journals.plos.org: Racial and ethnic disparities in fatal police shootings: Variation across U.S. states and the role of firearm ownership | PLOS One. journals.plos.org. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0333424

Notes well-documented national racial and ethnic disparities in fatal police shootings.

Recorded source metadata

pnas.org: Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United .... pnas.org. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1821204116

Finds that African American men and women face a higher risk of being killed by police than white peers.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt