trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Additional information can make all participants economically worse off
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Academic literature demonstrates that in standard neoclassical economies, providing public information can reduce risk-sharing opportunities and make all market participants worse off.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness - ScienceDirect Skip to main contentSkip to article - Purchase PDF - Access through your organization Search ScienceDirect ## Games and Economic Behavior Volume 97, May 2016, Pages 1-18 # The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness☆ Spyros Galanis Show more Add to Mendeley https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.03.001 Get rights and content ## Introduction In standard neoclassical economies with complete markets, where symmetrically informed agents trade state-contingent claims under uncertainty, Hirshleifer (1971) shows that providing public information may hurt all market participants, as it reduces the opportunities for risk-sharing. To provide an example, consider an economy with two risk averse agents and two, equally likely, states of the world, ah (the level of the assets of a specific company is high) and al (the level of the assets is low). The aggregate endowment for the economy is 1, constant across the two states. Agent 1 has all of the endowment at ah and nothing at al. If the agents do not receive any information before agreeing to trade, the unique equilibrium al
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness - ScienceDirectreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt