Additional information can make all participants economically worse off
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Academic literature demonstrates that in standard neoclassical economies, providing public information can reduce risk-sharing opportunities and make all market participants worse off.
The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness - ScienceDirect
Skip to main contentSkip to article
- Purchase PDF
- Access through your organization
Search ScienceDirect
## Games and Economic Behavior
Volume 97, May 2016, Pages 1-18
# The value of information in risk-sharing environments with unawareness☆
Spyros Galanis
Show more
Add to Mendeley
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.03.001 Get rights and content
## Introduction
In standard neoclassical economies with complete markets, where symmetrically informed agents trade state-contingent claims under uncertainty, Hirshleifer (1971) shows that providing public information may hurt all market participants, as it reduces the opportunities for risk-sharing. To provide an example, consider an economy with two risk averse agents and two, equally likely, states of the world, ah (the level of the assets of a specific company is high) and al (the level of the assets is low). The aggregate endowment for the economy is 1, constant across the two states. Agent 1 has all of the endowment at ah and nothing at al. If the agents do not receive any information before agreeing to trade, the unique equilibrium al