Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

A vaccine effectiveness rate of 95% means a 95% reduction in disease incidence among vaccinated individuals

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

refutedsupported

the weight of evidence

2 sources for · 0 against

A vaccine effectiveness or efficacy rate represents the percentage reduction in the number of disease cases among a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group.

Evidence for · 2

Wikipedia: Vaccine efficacy

cited by 0

Reference article covering this claim directly

citation format

See more details

How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by reference works, not journal abstracts.

More for · 1

who.int: Vaccine efficacy, effectiveness and protection

cited by 0

Explains that efficacy is based on how many vaccinated people developed disease compared to those receiving a placebo.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 7531 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt