trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A significant two-tailed test with a higher mean allows the inference that one condition is significantly higher.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature applying two-tailed tests to compare sample means routinely relies on a significant outcome with a higher observed mean to infer a significantly higher condition.

Evidence for · 2
Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia: Reticulocyte maturity indices in iron deficiency anemia
2014 · cited by 0
Uses a significant two-tailed t-test with a higher mean to infer that an anemic condition is significantly higher.
See more details
The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

More for · 1
OpenAIRE: Clinical Utility of Recently FDA Approved IntelliSep test (Sepsis biomarker) for early Diagnosis of Sepsis: Comparison with other Biomarkers and von Willebrand Factor/ADAMTS13 Ration
2024 · cited by 0
Demonstrates a two-fold higher mean score confirmed by significant two-tailed tests to infer higher sepsis risk.
Everything we examined (14)
  1. Wikipedia: Statistical significancereferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Wikipedia: Statistical hypothesis testreferenceno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Current Issues in Sport Science: The impact and sustainability of the prevention project 3! Winter Life Camp on young pupil’s knowledge on accident prevention and behaviour in winter alpine terrainpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia: Reticulocyte maturity indices in iron deficiency anemiapeer-reviewedsupports
  5. SAGE Open Nursing: Assessing Professional Competencies Among Undergraduate Jordanian Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Studypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. BMJ Open: Multicentre, open-label, prospective, parallel-controlled study protocol evaluating the effects of amino acid peritoneal dialysis solution on nutritional status in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patientspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. NeuroImage: Clinical: Structurofunctional resting-state networks correlate with motor function in chronic strokepeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Ожирение и метаболизм: Association of single nucleotide variants of the TCF7L2 , FABP2 , FTO , DRD2 , MC4R genes with morbid obesity in womenpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. OpenAIRE: Comparison of Final Exam Test Scores of Neuroscience Students Who Experienced Traditional Methodologies versus Problem-Based Learning Methodologiespeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. OpenAIRE: The minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) and aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis)peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. OpenAIRE: Pengaruh Animated Interactive Multimedia terhadap Pengetahuan Remaja Awal Tentang TRIAD KRRpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. OpenAIRE: ENHANCING CREATIVE THINKING SKILL IN THE HIGHER SECONDARY STUDENTSpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  13. OpenAIRE: Prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem: impact at 5 yearspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  14. OpenAIRE: Clinical Utility of Recently FDA Approved IntelliSep test (Sepsis biomarker) for early Diagnosis of Sepsis: Comparison with other Biomarkers and von Willebrand Factor/ADAMTS13 Rationpeer-reviewedsupports
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 6305 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt