trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A positive capital shock causes an increase in land prices
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference economic literature reports that capital shifts, such as lower interest rates or reductions in taxes on capital, lead to an increase in real estate and land values.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
Elastic supply of capital and labour The supply of labour can be affected by events like migration, shifts in the employment rate, and the availability of jobs. So, labour is highly elastic in supply, generally, in comparison to the absolutely inelastic supply of land. The elasticity of labour can be demonstrated in the Tiebout model. The supply of capital is perfectly elastic, due to the real interest rate. So, the revenue base does not disappear when taxes on capital and labour are cut. Most tax cuts cause land values to increase. Similar principles in other taxes These principles can also be seen in other taxes. Examples are given by Gaffney:[1] Lowering the corporate income tax raises stock prices. Lowering interest rates raises real estate prices. Wartime taxes lower land prices, and peace dividends let them rise again. Criticism Criticism of ATCOR is often criticism of its assumptions. One criticism is that labour and capital are not perfectly elastic, and that this assumption oversimplifies real world economics.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Simple English Wikipedia: ATCORreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt