trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A High Commissioner of the Police in Scotland existed in 1777
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

A historical discussion referencing a 1777 notice documents the appointment of a Commissioner of the Police in Scotland.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# What was the "high Commissioner of the Police in Scotland" in 1777? Tags: united-kingdom, law, 18th-century, government, scotland - Score: 10 - Views: 1366 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Curious Layman (2676 rep) - Asked: 2022-06-07 - Edited: 2026-04-25 - Site: history ## Question I was reading old newspapers, and came across the following notice from 1777: The relevant line appears to say that the King appointed “James Earl of March, to be first Commissioner of the Police in Scotland.” I am confident about most of the words, but less certain about “first.” It may say something else. What surprised me is the date. This notice appears to refer to a “Commissioner of the Police in Scotland” in 1777, and to say that James, Earl of March, was replacing the deceased Charles, Lord Cathcart. That seems to imply there was already a recognized police-related office in Scotland before 1777. The reason this caught my attention is that some seemingly reputable sources place the origin of organized policing in Scotland later. For example, the Glasgow Police Museum says that Glasgow’s first paid police force was created in 1779. I am also aware of the book Police in the Age of Im
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. What was the "high Commissioner of the Police in Scotland" in 1777?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt